
Lecture III
Stuttgart January 3, 1921
I have brought to your notice on the one hand how problematical it is
to conceive the celestial phenomena in their mathematical and geometrical
aspect alone. This is now being recognized by many people and from diverse
angles. Only quite unadvanced thinkers still maintain that the world-picture
of Copernicus and Galileo represents downright reality. Increasingly,
we hear the voice of those who find this way of thinking of the celestial
phenomena useful and practical, no doubt, for purposes of calculation,
yet emphasize that it represents only a certain mode of understanding,
and that quite other syntheses might be conceived.
There are even those who say, somewhat as Ernst Mach used to say: In
the last resort, one can uphold the Ptolemaic just as well as the Copernican
world-system, and a third system might equally well be devised. These
are but practical ways of correlating the observed facts. The entire realm
should now be confronted with a far freer kind of outlook.
You see from this that the problematical nature of the celestial charts,
described but a short time ago as replicas of the real facts, is now conceded
by the widest circles. On the other hand an escape from the manifest problems
and uncertainties of this realm can only be found through such views as
were brought forward in outline yesterday, -- views which no longer remove
Man from the whole cosmic background, but on the contrary, put him into
it from the outset. We have to recognize the processes within Man himself
in their connection with solar phenomena, lunar phenomena and terrestrial
phenomena, thus taking as a starting-point all that goes on in Man, in
order to find the way to what is going on out there in the Cosmos, the
latter being in some sense the cause of the processes in Man.
A path like this can of course only be trodden from the standpoint of
Spiritual Science. Precisely when we try to bring Astronomy into connection
with the most varied spheres of life, we shall find that we are being
led through Astronomy itself into the views of Spiritual Science. Bear
in mind that the visible celestial phenomena, perceptible to our senses
and also to our reinforced senses, appear at first a manifestation of
something outside of man. Man confronts and, as it were, arrests with
his senses whatever approaches him, introducing it into his conscious
world-picture. But the impulses streaming towards us from all sides, certainly
do not come to a standstill before our senses. All that goes on without
being held up by man's senses and brought into consciousness, all that
lives in the celestial influences that stream towards us from all sides,
must be sought for within our bodily organism. The organism must in a
certain way reflect it all, and it does this in the unconscious and subconscious
processes which can only be raised into consciousness in more complicated
ways.
We will now continue in a certain direction what we began yesterday.
Only an abstraction of our earthly world is dealt with in Geology or Mineralogy;
the Earth as described by Geology consists of minerals has evolved in
the mineral sphere; true as it is that forces are there in the Earth by
virtue of which it brings forth the minerals; yet is is equally true that
all that is living in plants, animals and physical human beings also belongs
to the Earth. We only see the Earth in its totality when we do not simply
cast aside what lives in plant, animal and man and have in mind the mere
abstraction "mineral earth ", but bring it all into our consciousness.
The living beings and entities that grow up out of the Earth are also
part and parcel of the whole.
Of all that belongs in this way to the Earth, let us first take the plant
kingdom. We will approach it in order then to find the transition to what
meets us in man. Whereas the mineral kingdom to a certain extent carries
on an independent Earth-existence and is only related to the Cosmos outside
the Earth in such a way as is shown, for example, in the changing of water
into ice in winter, the plant kingdom retains a much greater inner connection
with the cosmic surroundings of the Earth -- with all that enters the
Earth from the Cosmos. Through the plant-world the life of the Earth as
it were opens itself to the Universe. In geographical regions where in
a given season an intensive interaction is taking place between Earth
and Cosmos. We must pay heed to a phenomenon like this, for it will lead
us into the realm of Astronomy not only quantitatively, but qualitatively.
We must be able to derive our ideas from such a thing as this, even as
the astronomers of our time derive their ideas from angles, parallaxes
and so on.
Then we shall say to ourselves, for example: -- The plant-life, covering
a given region of the Earth, is a kind of sense-organ, sensitive to all
that is revealed towards the Earth out of the Cosmos. At seasons when
the interplay is more intense between a portion of the Earth's surface
and the Universe, it is as though a human being were opening his eyes
to the outer world to receive sense-impressions. And when the interplay
is less intense between the Earth and the Cosmos, the consequent decline
and inward closure of the vegetative life is like a closing of the eyes
to the Cosmos. It is more than a mere comparison to say that through its
vegetation a given territory opens its eyes to the Universe in spring
and summer and shuts its eyes in autumn and winter, and as by opening
and closing of our eyes we do in a way converse with the outer world,
so too it is a kind of information or revelation from the Universe which
the Earth receives by the opening and closing of its eyes through the
life of plants.
And to describe it a little more precisely, we may consider the vegetation
of a given region of the Earth when exposed, as it were, so to speak,
to the most vivid interplay with the solar life, and we may then turn
our attention to the state of vegetation in this region when it is not
thus exposed. The winter, I need hardly say, does not interrupt the vegetative
life of the Earth. It goes without saying that the vegetative life continues
through the winter. But it expresses itself in quite another way than
when exposed to the intensive working of the Sun's rays -- or, shall we
say, of the Cosmos. Under the influence of the solar life, the vegetative
life of the Earth shoots outward into form. The leaves unfold and grow
more complex; flowers develop. But when this is followed by the closing
of the eyes to the Universe, if we may call it so, the vegetative life
goes back into itself -- into the seed. Withdrawing from the outer world,
it no longer shoots into outward form; it concentrates, if I may put it
so, into a point; it becomes centered in itself.
We say describe this contrast truly as a law of Nature. The interplay
between the earthly and the solar life reveals itself in the Earth's vegetation.
Under the solar influence the vegetative life shoots outward into form;
under the influence of the earthly life it closes up into a plant, --
it becomes seed or germ. In all this there is a quality of expansion and
contraction or gathering into a center. Here we begin to apprehend the
relationships of space itself in a directly qualitative aspect. This is
the very thing which we must practice in the development of our ideas,
if we would attain to really fruitful notions and perceptions in this
sphere.
And now we pass from plant-life to the life of man. Naturally, what comes
to expression in the life of plants will find expression in man too. In
what way will it do so? What we somehow perceive, my dear Friends, so
outwardly and evidently in the life of plants - what we have visibly before
our eyes if only we are attentive to the qualitative aspect - this we
can recognize in man, properly speaking, only in the first years of childhood.
Let us then trace the interaction of the solar and terrestrial life for
man in the age of childhood, as we have just been doing for the plant
kingdom. The little child opens through the senses to receive the impressions
of the outer world. In doing so, the human being is really opening to
receive the solar life. You only need see things in the proper light to
recognize that what pours in upon our senses is inherently connected with
what is brought about in the terrestrial sphere by the Cosmos. You can
reflect upon the special case of light. When light and darkness succeed
each other in the alternation of day and night, impressions are made upon
our eyes by day, and no impressions are made by night. You can apply this
also to other perceptions, though it is more difficult to make it clear.
You will then say that a certain effect of the daily alternations, solar
and earthly, expresses itself in man's soul-life. Man has an activity
of soul through what arises in the rhythm of the day. What the Sun here
brings to the Earth comes to expression in the soul-life of man. But if
we follow the growth of the child, particularly until the 7th year - the
change of teeth - and go into all the details, we find how, notably in
the first years of the child's development (less and less, the older the
child becomes), it is plainly perceptible that the changing seasons, year
by year, have just as much significance for human growth as for the sprouting
and dying-down of the vegetation.
We will represent it diagrammatically. If, for example, we study carefully
and intelligently the development of the human brain in the earliest stages
from year to year, we shall find the following. We have the human skull
with its brain-content.
It remodels itself, and one can follow how it remodels itself through
what in the course of the changing year. Something which works formatively
and creatively upon the human head, molding it from outside in a corporeal,
physical sense, - we find this intimately connected with the forces playing
between Earth and Sun in the course of the year. In the daily rhythm we
find what enters through the senses, independent of growth, to work on
the soul and spirit of man. We see how what takes place in man by reason
of the Sun's activity in the daily rhythm, has an inner effect which frees
itself from the external world and becomes of a soul-and-spirit nature
it is what the child learns, what it assimilates through observation,
what takes place in effect, in soul and spirit. Then we see how in a totally
different tempo -- from a different aspect -- the brain remodels itself,
organizes itself, and grows. That is the other activity, the yearly activity
of the solar forces. We will say nothing yet of the changes occurring
in the Universe between Sun and Earth; we will consider manifestations
in man himself which are united with certain changes in the solar and
terrestrial life.
We consider the day and find the soul- and spirit-life of man connected
with the course of the Sun. We consider the change of seasons through
the year and find man's life of growth, the physical, corporeal life,
connected with the course of the Sun. We can say, The change taking place
between Earth and Sun in 24 hours has certain effects on the spirit and
soul of man. What happens between Earth and Sun in the course of the year
has certain effects on the physical, corporeal part of man. We shall have
to bring these effects into connection with others and thence arrive at
a world-concept which can no longer be deceptive, for it speaks to us
of real processes within ourselves, no longer dependent on illusory sense-impressions
or the like.
Thus we must gradually draw near to what can give us a sure basis for
the astronomical world-conception. We can only take our start from what
appears in man himself. So we can say: the day is something in man's connection
with the Cosmos that expresses itself in soul and spirit; the year is
something in man's connection with the Cosmos that expresses itself in
the physical-corporeal life, as for example in growth, and so on.
Now let us look at another complex of facts, referred to yesterday. With
human reproduction we must relate certain ideas referring to the life
of the Cosmos. We indicated yesterday that the female organism shows in
a striking manner how the monthly functions connected with the sex-life
-- though not, to be sure, coinciding with the Moon's phases -- are yet
a reflection of them in their time rhythm. The process wrests itself free
from the Cosmos, as it were, but still reflects the Cosmic Moon-process
in its periodic course. We have here an indication, my dear friends, of
inner processes in the human organism which we can study better if we
turn our attention to more familiar phenomena, such as may make these
more remote phenomena easier to understand.
There is something in the soul-life which actually reproduces in miniature
the organic processes to which we have just alluded. Let us say, we have
an outer experience which affects us through the senses and the mind,
-- perhaps also through our feelings. We retain a memory of the experience.
The recollection -- the retention of the experience -- leads to the possibility
of the picture of it emerging again at a later time.
Anyone who considers these facts, not on the basis of fanciful theories,
but with sound qualitative observation, will have to admit that in all
that arises within us by way of memory, our physical bodily organization
plays a part. The remembering itself is no doubt an event in the life
of soul, but it needs the inner basis of the physical body in order to
come into being. The activity of remembering is directly interrelated
with bodily processes; though this has not yet been investigated sufficiently
by external science. Comparing what occurs in the female organism in the
monthly periods (it occurs in the male organism too, only it is less evident;
it can be observed more in the etheric organism and this is not usually
done) -- comparing this with what happens in ordinary experience when
we remember something, one will certainly find a difference. Yet if with
sound inner perception one recreates the process in one's consciousness,
one cannot but say that the activity of remembering, this soul-occurrence
arising out of the physical organism, is similar to what takes place in
the monthly functions of the female organism, only is in miniature and
is more drawn into the realm of soul, less impressed upon the body. From
this point of view you will be able to say: Inasmuch as man individualizes
himself from the Cosmos, he develops the faculty of memory; inasmuch as
he still lives within the Cosmos, developing more his sub-conscious functions,
something in the nature of a common experience with the Cosmos arises,
connected with the Moon-processes in the Cosmos. This experience remains,
just as a past experience remains in our memory, and later it emerges
in an inner constitutional process, like a remembrance which has been
drawn into the body and has become organic.
There is no other way, my dear friends, of understanding these matters
than by thus proceeding from the simpler to the more complex. Just as
it is not necessary for a recollection to coincide with a fresh outer
experience, so it is not necessary for what appears in the female organism,
as a memory of an earlier cosmic connection of the human organism with
the phases of the Moon, to coincide in time with these phases. Nevertheless,
it is connected with the Moon's phases no less essentially than is the
recollection of an earlier experience with the experience itself. Here
then we have an activity in the human organism, more on the psychological
side and yet not unlike the effects -- precipitated, as it were, into
the life of time -- of influences due originally to the Moon. For the
organic periodicity of which we have been speaking embraces about 28 days,
as you know.
Now take the following. If we consider the daily influence of the Sun,
we find an inner activity of soul and spirit; if we consider the yearly
influence of the Sun, then we find laws of growth belonging to the outer
physical body. Thus we can say, for the Sun life:
-
Soul and Spirit: Day
-
Physical bodily nature: Year
And now we come to the Lunar activity. We pass on to consider the lunar
life, the life of the Moon. What I have just described as taking place
in rhythm of 28 days belongs indeed to the soul and spirit; it has only
impressed itself deeply into the body. Physiologically, there is really
no difference, in a finer sense, between what takes place in the body
on the arising of a memory with respect tot the event to which the memory
refers, and what takes place in the monthly periods of the female body
with respect to what the female organism experienced long ago in conjunction
with the phases of the Moon. Only the latter is a stronger, a more intensive
experience, -- a soul spiritual experience pressed more intensively into
the body. Thus, for the Lunar life:
1. Soul and Spirit: 28 day's activity
Let us now seek the corresponding phenomena for the physical body. What
will they be? You can find it for yourselves by deduction. We will have
bodily, physical effects with a 28-year period. As a day here corresponds
to a year, we shall have 28 years.
2. Physical bodily nature: 28 year's activity
You need only remember that 28 years is the period bringing us to our
full inner maturity of growth. It is then that we first cease to be in
the ascending scale of growth. Just as the Sun works upon us from outside
in its yearly activity, in order to complete in us an outward process
corresponding to the daily process in the inner life o soul and spirit,
so something works in the Cosmos in a 28-year period, organizing us from
outside even as the female human being is organized inwardly. (In her
it is more obvious than in the male, for in the man the corresponding
daily rhythm is more withdrawn into the etheric.) Here then a 28-day period
impresses itself inwardly in the realm of the soul and spirit, and we
can say: As the daily Sun-life is related to the yearly Sun-life in regard
to man, so the 28-day Moon-life related to the 28-year Moon-life with
respect to the whole man (the former belonging, in effect, more
to the human head).
You see how we place man, and rightly place him, into the whole Cosmos.
We leave off speaking of Sun and Moon merely as if we stood isolated here
on Earth, and only looked out with our eyes or with our telescopes to
Sun and Moon. We speak of Sun and Moon as of something inwardly united
with our very life, and we perceive the connection in the special configurations
of our life in time. Until we place man again, my dear friends, into the
picture of the doings of Sun and Moon, we shall not have evolved a firm
foundation for true Astronomy.
Thus a new science of Astronomy must be built upon a spiritual-scientific
basis. It must be evolved out of a more intimate knowledge of man himself.
We shall only be able to find a meaning in what is taught by the external
Astronomy of today, when we are in a position to base our hypotheses on
man himself. We shall then be able profitably to study the rather schematic
statements made in Astronomy today and we shall also be able to make essential
corrections in this external Astronomy.
What follows from all this? It follows that in these processes -- no
matter, for the moment, what the underlying basis of them is -- a universal
life reveals itself. Whether it by (and we will speak of this later)
that the daily and yearly rotations of the Earth underlie what I have
here described as solar life with respect to the soul and spirit for the
day, and to the physical bodily nature for the year; whether it be the
movements of the Moon described by modern Astronomy or something very
different; -- we shall never reach an understanding of it merely by setting
up the well-known picture taught in the Schools. But we must understand
all that is expressed in this picture as being in reality a continuing,
enduring universal life -- a life which cannot be approached in its fullness
by a mere series of diagrammatic pictures.
We will now set to work in another way. We will Bet to work from the
standpoint offered us in the Astronomical ideas of a man who still had
very much from the past. We do not want to return to the older ideas;
we must work out of new ideas This man, however, still had much of the
old qualitative virtues in his ideas. I refer to Kepler. Astronomy
has become more and more quantitative in modern time, and it would be
a delusion to look on Astrophysics as the entry of a qualitative element
into Astronomy; of an universal life that lay behind the work of Kepler.
In him a feeling still persisted that behind all that is manifest to ordinary
astronomical observation there lies hidden something like the gesture
of a vast cosmic life - a cosmic life that here reveals its presence.
If we have a man before us and see him move a hand or an arm, we do not
merely calculate the mechanics of the movement; we recognize it as the
outer revelation of an inner life of soul and spirit. We understand as
an expressive gesture something that can, after all, also be looked on
from a purely spatial, mathematical point of view. The further back one
goes in the history of man' e approach to Astronomy, the more one find
men conscious that the pictures they conceived of the path of the Sun
or of the stars were no mere passive pictures of indifferent events but
that these pictures were gestures of life and being. It is quite
easy to discern in olden times this feeling of the gesture-like nature
of the movements of the heavenly bodies. When my hand moves through the
air I shall not merely calculate its path, but in this path I see an expression
of the soul . So did the earlier observer see in the path of the Moon
an expression. of a life of soul. In all the movements of the heavenly
bodies he saw expressions of a soul-nature lie pictures it somewhat in
this s way -If I could held an umbrella here so that only my hand were
seen, my hand would make an inexplicable movement, for I am there behind
the umbrella; only the hand is to be seen. Somewhat in this way the men
of ancient times pictured that the movement of the Moon up in the sky
was but the outer expression - a sort of terminal 'limb' - end that the
really active being stood behind it. So too in earlier times men did not
speak of isolated heavenly bodies of the planets; they spoke of planetary
spheres. They spoke of the several spheres, belonging to the heavenly
bodies. Thus they distinguished the Moon-sphere, the Mercury-sphere, the
Venus-sphere, the Sun-sphere, the Mars-sphere, the Jupiter-sphere, the
Saturn-sphere, and then the eighth sphere - the Heaven of Fixed Stars
They distinguished these eight spheres and saw in them something which
expressed itself in outer gestures, so that a certain sphere expressed
itself by lighting up now here, now there, and so on. The reality, for
instance, was the sphere of the Moon. The Moon itself was not a
separate entity, - only the gesture. Where the Moon appeared, the Moon-sphere
was making a definite gesture I am relating this to show you the living
nature of the old conceptions.
Kepler still retained in his whole consciousness a feeling for this universal
life in space Only on this account was he able to draw up his three famous
Laws For modern Astronomy the three famous Laws of Kepler are purely of
a quantitative nature, to be regarded simply from the aspect of spatial
and temporal concepts. For a man who still worked out of such a life of
ideas as Kepler did, this was not the case. Let us now call to mind these
Laws of Kepler. They are:
The First Law:
The Planets move in ellipses round the central body, which is situated
in one of the foci of the ellipse.
The Second Law:
The Radius-vector of a Planet describes equal sectors, equal areas,
in equal periods of time.
The Third Law:
The squares of the periods of revolution of the different Planets are
proportional to the cubes of the major semi-axes
Now as we said, to the modern, purely quantitative view these laws too
are purely quantitative To anyone like Kepler, the very (:expression 'elliptical'
and the corresponding curve signified a greater livingness when it only
moves in a circle, for it must use an inner impulse in order continually
to alter the radius. When something simply moves in a circle it need do
nothing to alter the radius. A more intense inner life must be employed
in the radius-vector is continually altered. The simple. statement: "The
Planets move in ellipses round the central body and the central body is
not in the mid-point but in one of the foci of the ellipse", implied an
element of greater livingness than when something moves in a perfect circle.
Further: "The radius-vector describes equal sectors in equal periods
of time". We have here the transition from the line to the surface, to
the plane. Please notice this.' Inasmuch as at first only the ellipse
is described, we remain in the line - the curve- When we are directed
to the path that the radius-vector describes, we are led to the surface
- the area. A more intensive condition in the planetary movement is disclosed,
When the planet 'rolls along' - if I may express so myself - it is not
only expressing something within itself, but draws its tail after it,
as it were. The whole area which the radius-vector describes belongs to
it spiritually. Moreover, in equal periods of time equal areas are described,
Special attention is thus drawn to the quality, the inherent character
of the movement of the planets.
The third Law above all relates to the life that plays its part between
the various planets. This Law assumes a more complicated form. "The squares
of the periods of revolution of the Planets are in proportion to the cubes
of the semi-major axes" (or of the mean distance from the central body).
This Law, you see, contains a great deal if one still understands it in
Kepler's living way. Newton then killed the law. He did this in a very
simple fashion. Take Kepler's Third Law. You can write it thus:
or, written differently:
Now write it in a somewhat different form. Write it thus:
I might of course also have written it in the reverse order.)
What have we on the left-hand side of the equation, here in the left-hand
ratio? No less than what is expressed by one half of Newton's Law.
and oil the other side the other hail', the forces of Newton's Law-.
You need only write Kepler's Law thus differently and you can say: ' The
forces or attraction are inversely proportional to the squares of the
distances." Here then you have the Newtonian Law of Gravity deduced
from the Law of Kepler. The force of gravity between the planets,
the celestial bodies, is in inverse proportion to the squares of their
distances apart. It is nothing else than the killing of Kepler's Third
Law. In principle that is what it is.
But now take the matter actively and livingly. Do not set before yourself
the dead product " force of gravity" - "the forces of attraction decrease
with the squares of the distances", - but take what is living still in
Kepler's form, the squares of the periods of time. Fill out the
caput mortum of the Newtonian force of attraction, which is a mere
external concept, with what is implied in the square of the period of
time, and you will fill with inner life of the Newtonian concept, which
is really the corpse of an idea.' For inner life has to do with time.
And here you have before you not only time in its simple course, you have
time squared -time to the second power! We shall yet have to come back
to what it means to speak of 'time squared' But you can realize that to
speak of time to the second power is to speak or something of an inward
nature. It is, indeed, time which in the life of man actually represents
the course of his inner soul-life. The point is that we should look right
through it dead concept of the Newtonian force of attraction to that which
suddenly darts into the center, bringing time into it and therewith bringing
in an element of inner life.
Now look at the matter from another point of view. Notice that Kepler's
first Law also has reference to the Earth. Not only does the Earth describe
an ellipse, but you, since you are on the Earth, describe an ellipse
together with it. What takes place outwardly is in you an inner process.
Thus the arising of the ellipse from the circle, in the living way in
which Kepler still conceived it, corresponds to a process in your own
inner being. And inasmuch as you move in the line which is formed by the
radius-vector describing equal sectors in equal times, it is you
who continually relate yourself to the central body, placing yourself
in relation to your own Sun. You, together with the curve, are describing
a path in time, along which you are in continual relation to the Sun.
If I may put it a little quaintly You must take care all the time that
you do not 'skid' or side-slip, that you do not go too fast, - that your
radius-vector does not describe too great an area. This outer point which
moves in the ellipse must be continuously in the right relation to the
Sun. There you have the movement you yourselves make, characterized as
a pure line in space. The relation to the Sun is characterized in the
Second Law.
And if we pass on to the Third Law, you have an inner experience of the
relation to the other planets - your own living connection with the other
planets.
Thus we not only have to find, in man himself, processes that lead us
out again into the Cosmos. If we interpret rightly the mathematical pictures
presented to us by the cosmic process, we also turn into an inner experience
what is apparently external and quantitative. For the cosmic Mathematics
indwells man. Man is himself in the midst of the living Mathematics. Of
this we shall speak more tomorrow.
|